GOOD EVENING DEAR READERS! Retype AFTER LONG TIME LEAVING INTERESTING An article THAT IS VERY UNDERSTANDING irreverence VENICE IN THESE TIMES "servility" WHAT IS GOING ON IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION! YOU COMMENT!
Servants of Berlusconi. There it is, the all-inclusive definition to indicate who wrote the Journal, on Free or for those who work in Mediaset or RAI area in PDL. I hear it every day on TV, I read between the lines of many newspapers, meeting in blogs, sometimes even in the square and down the street and feel miserable theater resonate in politics. Ah, with what contempt appeal of Berlusconi Il Giornale. I will not tell then Belpietro Sallusti and because of their visibility in daily video. Maybe there will be a link between this and the attack contempt fallito a Belpietro, ma non voglio qui stabilire il nesso tra infamia e terrore, disprezzo e violenza. Vorrei affrontare il tormentone della servitù, che continua imperterrito anche quando Berlusconi critica i giornali amici e Feltri risponde in modo assai poco servile che quella è la porta e appena l’editore lo chiede, è pronto a infilarla. Per quel che mi riguarda, benché il più lontano possibile dal video o da incarichi redazionali, trovo traccia ogni giorno, a partire dai blog, di insulti del genere. Potrei dire che la cosa non mi tocca, che parlano gli scritti, la biografia, le scelte, ma direi una bugia: invece mi dà fastidio, anzi doppio fastidio, perché mi offende sul piano personale e perché offende la verità. We are servants of Berlusconi
around? But of course, never mind. A powerful in a country like ours, used for centuries to slavery and the flattery, I do not have servants? If we are servants of little princes and leaders or tin, let alone if there are no servants or minions of King Silvio. I learned to distinguish the servants through three tests psycho. The first is the sequence of cause and effect. If a journalist has changed his beliefs according to Berlusconi, was unlikely to be a servant. However, if those convictions had before there was Berlusconi, much less. Example: Felt, and with him Belpietro and other positions, even with the center-right Independent, before Berlusconi came down in Policy (I might also say of me, which I founded in '92 Italy weekly and they are right since I left, that is, always). The servants follow the master, not precede it in the choices. So, do not have those opinions because they write in the Journal, but the opposite: they write in the Journal because they have those opinions. The proof is that with views so you do not take mica in other major Italian newspapers, let alone give you directions or leading roles; mica can not express elsewhere, in the press "free", what do you think, if you think that Berlusconi is preferable to Fini , Casino or the left.
The second test is to see if views change with the changing interests of the alleged owner. Evaluate whether you and who did it. Ignores me, I would be too easy to demonstrate the many times I go out by the choirs, including the lesser of Berlusconi. I will just do a couple of examples. Everything you think, dear readers, the case Boffo least one thing: that it was useful to the Chief and wished him. I do not think at all that has benefited politically. And the investigation was helped by the Prime Minister Fini to an extent at least equal to the times that have harmed or caused problems. If I understand Felt, his primary interest, non-negotiable, as they say today, is to be successful with the newspapers, sell more, increase readership, healing budgets. On the other hand we as a profession that makes the sign of vanity, held before everything good name, and since the people now getting on in years and wealthy, does not need someone to give him pocket money and feed. If you hear politicians talk in private they say 'is uncontrollable, "or as he told me a comiziante diver placing a veto," it's unmanageable. " Just handle it, you handle the resale of the tobacco and salt, not the ideas of free people and pensanti.Ma the third and most effective tests to measure the easement is as follows: try to imagine what remains of what servant without the real or perceived its owner or without a post he held. If there is little or nothing, is worth little or nothing. If you are his writings, his ideas, his credibility, his readers, then it is unlikely to be a servant. During this time I see so many arrogant void that tower in video and in newspapers only as a dealer of their leader. If you take away that status is zero. Well, I think that the definition of a servant, it suits them. It does not include the idea of \u200b\u200breturning the rudeness and call servants who do not think like me. You can have the worst opinion of or Santoro Travaglio, or Scalfari of Eco, but do not call them slaves because they are not. Imagine if a right-wing journalist Gad Lerner as happened to become director of Tg1 with the center-left government and also spokesman for Prime Minister: it would be immediately branded as a servant. Lerner did not share his beliefs at all, but not was not a servant. So you need to restore a
etiquette of the press and the civilization of mutual respect. During the first conflict in the pauses of the war, soldiers in the trenches were exchanging cigarettes and even spoke to each other, only to return to shoot himself. It happened for example in Junger and Drieu La Rochelle who fought on opposing trenches. If it happens in war, all the more reason should happen in time of peace and democracy (although I'm told that a leader would say: "I will be politically dead in the grave but I'll take Berlusconi").
In our press, rather than the servility or alleged gag, the real evil is the conformity of politically correct, the line of caste, the thigh, to the sect. And there, I assure you, Berlusconi is not the chorus but minority and express, think, a culture of opposition on their side even if they have the prime minister and perhaps the majority of Italians.
0 comments:
Post a Comment