GOOD EVENING DEAR READERS! I leave you with an articulated VERY INTERESTING FOR MOST OF THAT TO BE A STRONG MAN LIKE ME WHO BELIEVES THAT THE POLICY MUST COMPLY WITH THE LAWS AS EACH OF U.S. IS! THANKS MAX! YOU COMMENTS!! TO PROXXXXXXXXXXX !!!!!
POLITICIANS MAKE THE LAWS, THE MUST ALSO MEET!
published in "The gazette the" Massimo Fini 11/20/2009 20/11/2009
Whenever a court reaches the prime minister, a minister, a secretary, an elected official, a governor, a commissioner, a public administrator, a party secretary, he invariably speaks of 'political use of justice. " But even those who do not think that judges are authors of a 'conspiracy' claims that, in doing so, they are "objectively" policy, which is unacceptable because the policy must maintain complete autonomy of the judiciary. If every time the magistrate arbitrarily affects a politician is ingested in a field that is not for it or, as it expresses Victor Felts on "Il Giornale", "used improper means" for political purposes, the only logical conclusion that if they can drawn is: the political class should be exempted from compliance with the Penal Code. Even if it is never said explicitly, this is the goal you want to get, by hook or by crook. Is it right? I think not. Not only because it violates the fundamental principle of every liberal equality of all citizens before the law, but because the ruling classes should be the first to set a good example. It expects to have at least the duties of all other citizens, I think the minimum. On the other hand we want the politicians to evade the laws that they themselves do. A privilege not enjoyed the constitutional monarch. Everything would be easier if the politicians do not commit crimes in an avalanche, if within their the offense should remain an exception. Now it is true that democracies have historically and statistically the most corrupt regimes - and that in itself should make us think - because they are based on consensus, and to have consensus and we need the money to get the other one was placed on each ease, but corruption in Italy has exceeded the physiological limit.
There are at least forty years - since it gradually disappeared as selected by the ruling class war - that we see an uninterrupted series of scandals. It is not a "moral issue" as they say, is a criminal affair. Yet our population seems to accept this state of affairs. With the strong support of the majority of the media every is good reason, every fallacy is valid, for carrying out the corrupt politicians. Craxi, who fled their country for not serving a sentence of ten years in prison, not a fugitive, but an "exile" as Gobetti, as Nenni as Pertini under fascism. For Berlusconi, speaking as established fact of "aggressive record" never been a legal category to which they would plead, beg your pardon for the comparison, even Totò Riina. I heard the Minister La Russa said, like many others, that this "aggressive" is proven by the fact that the entrepreneur Berlusconi has been left in peace for twenty years and the judiciary has begun to deal with it only when it became a political leader. La Russa to forget that in between is "Clean Hands" that has been pursued politicians and businessmen of the first magnitude, including Fiat, and therefore not so surprising if at some point also came to Berlusconi. Or he is the only immaculate lily in a basket of flowers rotted? If the wrong pay, like everyone else. The consensus, even deserved, can not become a license to commit crimes.
0 comments:
Post a Comment